sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014

UCRÂNIA IV- UCRAINA IV - UKRAINE IV

http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/52e13f356da811261240e236-1200-600/ukraine-15.jpg
Ukraine: Demonstrations for political freedom! Photo REUTERS/Alexander Demianchuk
 
Democracies need have antidotes against the poisons of disctatorships between elections or after an election. Shame cover the elected President of Ukraine that use brutal force against peaceful demonstrators or put in risk the life of demonstrators that use force against force. The berkut special forces are authocratic and terrorist forces that fired against persons. The terror that forces tried to create implicate more and more indignation from citizens! Repressive stalinistic machine over persons go on with an increase of personal, familial and group of influence power (see Taras Ilkiv, Business Insider 23-01-2014 http://www.businessinsider.com/understanding-euromaidan-2014-1).

domingo, 19 de janeiro de 2014

EROSÃO - EXESA - EROSION

http://www.jn.pt/Storage/ng1319904.jpg
«Praia de São Pedro de Maceda» foto José Carmo/Global Imagens

EROSÃO

A costeira erosão
Afecta a nobre Nação
Em tempos que já lá vão
Havia decisão e consequente acção

Para fazer face à degradação
Das dunas e suas areias em expansão
Plantou-se pinhal
Na defesa de Portugal



Comentário ao excelente texto de João Pedro Saldanha Serra «Erosão Costeira e Defesa Nacional» (http://polis-phonia.blogspot.pt/2014/01/erosao-costeira-e-defesa-nacional.html)

Erosão, erosão
Rima com desordenada construção
Que num intenso turbilhão
Invadiu a costa até mais não

INTERESSES ESTRATÉGICOS NACIONAIS - STRATEGICUS INTERESSE NATIONALIS - NATIONAL STRATEGIC INTERESTS

http://www.anna.aero/wp-content/gallery/tap-portugal-launches-flights-to-bucharest-in-romania-from-lisbon/tap-portugal-slideshow-598x300-1.jpg
http://www.anna.aero/wp-content/gallery/tap-portugal-launches-flights-to-bucharest-in-romania-from-lisbon/tap-portugal-slideshow-598x300-2.jpg
«TAP Portugal’s early morning flight was welcomed to the Romanian capital airport Bucharest Otopeni with a water cannon salute. The crew then posed for the camera to commemorate the first flight from Lisbon.»
http://www.anna.aero/2012/07/04/tap-portugal-launches-flights-to-bucharest-in-romania-from-lisbon/http://boasnoticias.sapo.pt/img/1381146249tap.jpghttp://imageshack.us/a/img805/1977/mapamundo.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img411/7725/tapeurope.jpg
TAP: «European and world wide flight network» Beto Chaves (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1555690)

One of the options of the Financial Assistance Program to Portugal (2011-2014) was privatizations and Portuguese Government had a timing to save the strategic assets in determinant sectors for national interest: a maximum of 90 days after September of 2011, so December of 2011.

Only in December of 2013, 2 years after the legal limit, Portuguese Government decided a proposal of law about that legal commitment. The Government talk about oposition from Troika and deep analysis near European Commission and European legal praxis. Don´t have any explanation, only the fault about defense of Natinal interest!

«Interesse» in Latin (interest) means «inter» «esse», «between» «to be», «to be or lie between» (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/interesse). And between timing and now persons like António Borges (PSD and Government consultant) and José Luís Arnaut (jurist of PSD now in Goldman Sachs) manage business of a lot of money in sectors with strong market power, public utilities, oligopolies, cartels with easy profits, with abuses of dominant position:
- Energy (electric production and distribution: REN and EDP for China and Oman)
- Telecomunications (PT sold Vivo shares to Telefonica, distribute a lot of money to shareholders and employees and bought shares in Oi that will absorve PT in the Brazilian giant)
- Cements (Cimpor to Brazilian groups)
- Banks (BPN to Angola)
- Assurances (Fidelidade from statal Caixa Group to China)
- Transports (high profitability of airports management of ANA to France)
- Postages (CTT to USA, Goldman Sachs and it clients)

Waiting for a potential privatization:
- Transports (Aerian transports, TAP)
- Water and Environment (Águas de Portugal, ...)

Portuguese Government talk about Energy, Transports and Communication in it vacuum of defence of Nation! It´s a Goovernment of other interests, like external interests. What for this that PSD wanted win political power in 2011? And CDS is a cumplice political party in this disaster!

Where is all of money of privatizations? Public debt increase a lot of thousands of millions €!!!! Political society and state still with expenses that don´t create value to Nation, worst absorbed value creation by Companies and Families! Where is the National interest?

BE CAREFUL WITH TAP DEEP LINKED TO NATIONAL STRATEGIC INTERESTS!!!!


«APROVADA PROPOSTA DE LEI SOBRE SALVAGUARDA DO INTERESSE NACIONAL EM EMPRESAS ESTRATÉGICAS» 2013-11-28 às 15:49 http://www.portugal.gov.pt/pt/os-ministerios/ministro-da-presidencia-e-dos-assuntos-parlamentares/mantenha-se-atualizado/20131128-mpap-interesses-estrategicos.aspx:


«O Conselho de Ministros aprovou uma proposta de lei que autoriza o Governo a criar um regime de salvaguarda de ativos estratégicos essenciais para a defesa e segurança nacional e para a segurança do aprovisionamento do País em serviços fundamentais para o interesse nacional, nas áreas da energia, transportes e comunicações. Esta salvaguarda será feita através da avaliação das operações de que resulte o controlo, direto ou indireto, sobre empresas portuguesas estratégicas por entidades de países de fora da União Europeia.
O Ministro da Presidência e dos Assuntos Parlamentares, Luís Marques Guedes, afirmou que o Governo passa a poder desencadear um procedimento de oposição às privatizações num prazo de 30 dias, sendo depois notificados os detentores dos ativos, e no prazo de 60 dias o Governo tem de tomar uma decisão final sobre a privatização. A oposição do Governo torna «nulo e totalmente ineficaz» o negócio.
O Ministro referiu que «esta matéria teve desde o início a oposição da troika, e continua a ter», por entender que este regime de salvaguarda seria «uma segunda maneira de repor as golden share». Chamam-se ações douradas (golden shares) a disposições contratuais que permitem ao Estado determinar decisões relevantes de empresas nas quais possui apenas uma pequena quantidade de ações, e foram eliminadas em 2011, na sequência de uma decisão do tribunal da UE.
Contudo, este não é o entendimento do Governo, afirmou Marques Guedes, que acrescentou que a aprovação da proposta ocorreu depois de «uma profunda analise» que envolveu a consulta à Comissão Europeia, à jurisprudência dos tribunais e à legislação comparada de outros países.
É assim dado cumprimento à disposição pela qual a Assembleia da República incumbiu o Governo de estabelecer o regime de salvaguarda de ativos estratégicos em sectores fundamentais para o interesse nacional, procurando seguir legislações similares aprovadas por outros Estados-Membros da União Europeia, bem como respeitar a jurisprudência dos tribunais europeus nesta matéria.»

DEPUTADA(O)S - DEPUTATA(US) - DEPUTIES (MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT)


CDS parliamentary swallowed one more frog froom it horrible political partner (PSD) in the name of what?

Forced votes by members of Portuguese Parliament and supporters of Portuguese Government create finnally reactions for more than one deputy. About a crucial question for the future of Portugal? About over taxes that still over Families? No. About a question of a lobby with influence over deputies that implicate a lot of time of them limited disponibility. With crisis without a real answer was the same lobby, the same time losted in 2009 and 2010 in a not Nacional priority and very polemic question! But in 2010 lobby win with the votes of the majority of members of Parliament without the wanted actual extension of the pack. Now, for escape for a polemic votation, the incredible leadership of PSD manipulate referendum that was not proposed for overtaxes to closeup the hoopholes created by political society, state and banks!!!
http://www.abola.pt/img/fotos/mundos/lusa/politicos/TeresaLealCoelho.jpg
Teresa Leal Coelho (PSD) presented her demision of vice president of parliamentary group ...
http://www.cds.parlamento.pt/gp/images/stories/Teresa%20Caeiro.jpg
«A minha intenção era votar contra esta iniciativa, mas houve outras orientações na bancada do CDS. Para que não haja quem considere deslealdade parlamentar, conformei o meu voto em relação a algo que não acredito e que considero uma iniciativa lamentável» Teresa Caeiro (CDS)
http://p3.publico.pt/sites/default/files/franciscaalmeida_dr.jpg
«Anuncio que apresentarei uma declaração de voto dando conta do grave precedente que constitui esta votação. A minha intenção era votar contra» Francisca Almeida (PSD)

http://cdn.controlinveste.pt/Storage/JN/2013/big/ng2555639.jpg
«Assistimos a um caso de ´bullying´ político ao qual nunca tinha assistido em democracia representativa (...) um triste dia para a democracia representativa (...) à força da disciplina de voto.» «Um referendo numa lógica de toda a gente decidir quais são os direitos fundamentais de uma minoria é um referendo que contraria a própria lógica referendária numa sociedade amiga dos direitos humanos. Não se referendam direitos humanos de minoria» Isabel Moreira (PS)

This vision of representation is very confortable for political parties and some minorities with influence but badly for the Nation: representatives received millions of blank sheets of paper signed to do all they wanted by the majority of members of Parliament? The resultant are a disaster, more than two hundred thousands of millions € of public debt! Represented Persons paid all by taxes without a deep reform of polital society and state! Who defende them?

If members of Parliament don´t vote with freedom is time to change this game of representation, for example by these ways:
- First of all representatives need a direct vote of represented;
- Represented could vote in persons of different lists (of political parties or mouvements);
- Representatives have a self programme linked to the programme of list, of the political party or mouvement;
- Representatives could have freedom of vote;
- Representatives could lost the representation if don´t respect them programme like the Government.
- Represented could control the application of elective programmes by referendum as a pression over it realization by representatives and Goverment.

sábado, 18 de janeiro de 2014

AUSTRÁLIA - AUSTRALIA - AUSTRALIA

http://imagens6.publico.pt/imagens.aspx/820856?tp=UH&db=IMAGENS&w=749
A book of pray of a Portuguese nun, Catarina de Carvalho, created between 1580 and 1620, in the dark times of Spanish control, show a animal that seems a kangaroo, another piece for the puzzle of Australia discovering ...

AUSTRALIA come from the Latin AUSTRALIS meaning Southern.

By it North The navigateur Willem Janszoon (1570-1630) from Netherlands, knew the gulf of Carpentaria in 1606. For the majority of historians he is the leader of the European disvoring of Australia. But many ways go to a Portuguese discovering:
Ficheiro:LocationEastTimor.svg
Map of East Timor created by Vardion (Wikipedia) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.pt

- Portuguese discovered Timor in 1512, so near Australia and so far from Portugal;
http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/ds/huntington/images/000417D.gif
«East Coast of Australia»(?) PORTOLAN ATLAS, Nicholas Vallard, Dieppe, 1547 http://dpg.lib.berkeley.edu/webdb/dsheh/heh_brf?Description=&CallNumber=HM+29             
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2e/Australia_first_map.jpg/800px-Australia_first_map.jpg
«Facsimile of chart from Nicholas Vallard's manuscript sea atlas (1547), (...) was given the title "The first Map of Australia from Nicholas Vallard's Atlas, 1547" by the English publisher in 1856. The original Vallard chart was produced in Dieppe, France in the 16th century, and is thought by several writers to represent Portuguese charting of the eastern coast of Australia. This copy is held by the National Library of Australia.» http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Australia_first_map.jpg
- European map show a probable coast of Australia before Netherlands mission;
- The Portuguese navigateur Gomes de Sequeira probably contact Australia in 1525 when leading a Portuguese mission to explore the limits of Treaty of Tordesilhas between Portugal and Castilla (1492);
Cristóvão de Mendonça in him secret mission of discovering the Gold Island probably contact of the East cost of Australia in 1522 represented in the map of 1547 (defended also by the Australian journalist Peter Trickett published in 2007 in The Sidney Morning Herald)
«(...) (1522) Armada de Cristovam de Mendonça que foy descobrir a ilha do ouro no ditto tempo.
Item, ho navyo Sam Christovam em que elle vaii
Item, a caravella Rosayro capitão Pedr'Eanes Francces3
Item, ho bragantym Sant'Antonio capitão Francisco Pereira

Item, hum parao capitão Gonçalo Homem que he seu e carrega-se a custa dell reii per hordenança do governador que ho asy requereo por ho aver por seu serviço pêra este descobrimento. (...)» Relação dos navios que servem na Índia 1522 (Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo, Lisboa)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Arafura_Sea_map.png
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/islands_oceans_poles/oceania_ref01.pdf

True in History always come above like the olive oil in water ...
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/olive-oil-water-2464575.jpg
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/olive-oil-water-2464575.jpg

TIMOR - TIMORIA - TIMOR

http://at-communication.com/upload/Image/Timor-Leste_DX-News_4W3A.jpg
http://www.pickandgotravel.com/wp-content/gallery/timor-leste-2/timor-leste-9.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e7/Timorese_Dancers.jpg/448px-Timorese_Dancers.jpg
Sculptures simbolise the Christian faith by Jesus and Him mother.


Timorese Dancers in a photo by Graham Crumb (Wikipedia) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.pt

TIMOR, TIMUR means East. TIMORIA in Latin means Land of East.

In the heart of Portuguese, Timor have a great place! We wish happiness to heroic and Christian Timorese Persons!!!
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9XORsM1TjIk/Tjz4gazYJSI/AAAAAAAAC1A/xZWun-hiMvI/s1600/bandeira_portugal_timor.jpg
Portuguese and Timorese flags

FRANÇA - FRANCIA - FRANCE

http://www.lesechos.fr/medias/2014/01/17/643515_0203247028760_web_tete.jpg
http://www.lesechos.fr/journal20140117/lec1_france/0203248398191-budget-le-deficit-de-l-etat-plus-lourd-que-prevu-en-2013-643515.php

The President of France expose him proposal for a «Pacte de Responsabilitè» (January 14, 2014):

«(...) c'est sur l'offre qu'il faut agir. (...) Sans entreprises, pas de créations d'emplois. (...) Je fixe un nouvell objectiv, c´est que d´ici 2017, pour les entreprises et pour les travailleurs indépendants, ce soit la fin des cotisations familiales. Cela représente 30 milliards d´euros de charges (...) moins de charges sur le travail, moins de contraintes sur leurs activités et, en même temps, une contrepartie, plus d'embauches et plus de dialogue social.»

«Je constituerai autour de moi un conseil stratégique de la dépense. Il se réunira chaque mois pour évaluer les politiques publiques (...) loi de programmation de nos finances publiques et sociales sur la période 2015-2017 (...) votée à l'automne.»
The President propose a decrease  of public expenses (weight of 57% of GDP!) as a way to control public deficit, not by taxes:
- 15.000 M€ - 2014 
- 50.000 M€ - 2015/2017

http://www.lesechos.fr/medias/2014/01/03/640486_0203218966204_web_tete.jpg
«L'Insee estime que le crédit d'impôt compétitivité emploi permettra de créer 30.000 emplois au 1er semestre 2014.» http://www.lesechos.fr/economie-politique/politique/actu/0203217977134-pacte-de-responsabilite-les-scenarios-pour-faire-baisser-les-charges-sociales-des-entreprises-640486.php

So France slowly, try to change the hard weight of it State, but we don´t see at the moment a deep reform of the State as the root of the intentions about public expenses and riks like in Portugal to a biase related to the sense of the decrease: support direct and indirectly the creation oof Value by France, by Portugal or by other European country with the diferent but also with the same problems: Europe need a State that support all of actual good ways that generate Value and not all of the actual bad ways that don´t generate Value! For example a very good Public offer of health cares and education services with efficience and efficacity create Value. The purchase of submarines or cars for the European net of polital societies wth primary keynesian arguments, don´t create Value! Blinded cuts of public expenses in Health, Education, Training, Research and Culture, for example, with primary liberal arguments, don´t prejudice the creation of Value by the Nations!
In United States of America we have the example of the blind «Tea Party» but also the blind Paul Krugman in the other side. We need a much more complex and in the same time simple approach about Public Action!

quinta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2014

PORTUGUESA(E)S - LUSITANI - PORTUGUESE


Montgomery County Council President Nancy Navarro, Cidalia Luis-Akbar and Natalia Luis, owners of M. Luis Construction Co., Inc. with Portuguese roots

In him visit to M. Luis Construction the President of United States of America said in 3-10-2013 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2013/10/03/president-obama-speaks-economic-impact-government-shutdown#transcript):

«Remarks by the President on the Government Shutdown

M. Luis Construction Company, Rockville, Maryland
10:49 A.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, everybody!  (Applause.)  Good to see all of you.  Please, please have a seat.  Well, hello, Rockville! 
Let me start by recognizing three public servants who fight hard every day for Maryland families and businesses.  First of all, Congressman Chris Van Hollen is here.  (Applause.)  Yay, Chris!  Congressman John Delaney is here.  (Applause.)  And we have the acting head of the Small Business Administration -- Jeanne Hulit is here.  (Applause.)
And I also want to give a big thanks to your bosses, Cidalia and Natalia, for being such gracious hosts.  I had a chance to meet them at the White House.  (Applause.)  Thank you.  Now I know where they got their good looks from, because I had a chance to meet mom and dad, and their beautiful families.  So I’m so glad to be here.  And I had a chance to learn a little bit about their story.  So when their parents brought them from Portugal to America almost 40 years ago, no one in the family spoke a word of English.  But that didn’t stop their father, Manuel, and their mother, Albertina, from having a big dream -- believing that if they worked hard, they could get ahead, and that even though they’d never had any schooling, maybe their daughters could go to college; maybe in America you could make it if you tried.  That’s what they believed. 
So they started their own construction company with a pickup truck and a wheelbarrow.  And when Cidalia and Natalia turned 14, they began to help -- cleaning tools, translating documents.  And they became the first in their family to go to college.  After graduation, they started their own business, and later they bought the family business from their parents.  So today, M. Luis Construction is a $60 million company with about 250 employees.  (Applause.)  And I understand you’re opening your fourth office at the end of this month.  So this story is what America is all about.  You start off -- maybe you don’t have a lot -- but you’re willing to work hard, you put in the time, opportunities out there, and you’re able to pass on an even better life to your family, your children, your grandchildren.
And it’s good news that after how hard the construction industry got hit during the recession, things are starting to get a little better.  Remember, it was just five years ago that our economy was in free fall.  Businesses were shedding hundreds of thousands of jobs every single month, and the recession ultimately cost millions of Americans their jobs, their homes, their savings -- everything they had worked hard to build. 
Today, over the last three and a half years, our businesses have added 7.5 million new jobs.  (Applause.)  Our deficits are falling.  Our housing market is healing, which means construction is improving; manufacturing is growing; the auto industry is back.  America is on pace to become the number one energy producer in the world this year.  (Applause.)  More small businesses have gotten loans so they can grow and they can hire -- just like M. Luis did with the help of the Small Business Jobs Act that I signed three years ago.  So that’s part of what allowed this company to grow.  (Applause.) 
So we still have a long way to go.  We've still got a lot of work to do, especially to rebuild the middle class.  But we're making steady progress.  And the reason I'm here is, we can't afford to threaten that progress right now.  Right now, hundreds of thousands of Americans, hardworking Americans, suddenly aren’t receiving their paycheck.  Right now, they're worrying about missing the rent, or their mortgage, or even making ends meet.  We can all relate to that.  Imagine if suddenly you weren't sure whether you were going to get your next paycheck, with all the bills that might be mounting up.  Well, that’s what's happening right now to hundreds of thousands of Americans across the country. 
Companies like this one worried that their businesses are going to be disrupted, because obviously, particularly in an area like Maryland, Virginia, where there are a lot of federal workers, you don’t know how that’s going to impact the economy.  Veterans, seniors, women -- they're all worrying that the services they depend on will be disrupted too. 
And the worst part is, this time it’s not because of a once-in-a-lifetime recession.  This isn't happening because of some financial crisis.  It's happening because of a reckless Republican shutdown in Washington.
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  That’s right!  (Applause.) 
THE PRESIDENT:  Now, we’ve all seen the offices locked down, the monuments closed.  We’ve heard about services denied, we've heard about benefits that are delayed.  But the impacts of a shutdown go way beyond those things that you're seeing on television.  Those hundreds of thousands of Americans -- a lot of whom live around here -- don’t know when they're going to get their next paycheck, and that means stores and restaurants around here don’t know if they'll have as many customers. 
Across the country you've got farmers in rural areas and small business owners who deserve a loan, but they're being left in the lurch right now.  They might have an application pending as we speak, but there's nobody in the office to process the loan.  The SBA gives a billion dollars of loans a month to small businesses -- a billion dollars a month goes to small businesses all across the country.  Right now those can't be processed because there's nobody there to process them. 
Veterans who deserve our support are getting less help.  Little kids who deserve a Head Start have been sent home from the safe places where they learn and grow every single day.  And of course, their families then have to scramble to figure out what to do.  And the longer this goes on, the worse it will be.  And it makes no sense. 
The American people elected their representatives to make their lives easier, not harder.  And there is one way out of this reckless and damaging Republican shutdown:  Congress has to pass a budget that funds our government with no partisan strings attached.  (Applause.) 
Now, I want everybody to understand what's happened, because sometimes when this gets reported on everybody kind of thinks, well, you know, both sides are just squabbling; Democrats and Republicans, they're always arguing, so neither side is behaving properly.  I want everybody to understand what's happened here.  The Republicans passed a temporary budget for two months at a funding level that we, as Democrats, actually think is way too low because we’re not providing help for more small businesses, doing more for early childhood education, doing more to rebuild our infrastructure.  But we said, okay, while we’re still trying to figure out this budget, we’re prepared to go ahead and take the Republican budget levels that they proposed.
So the Senate passed that with no strings attached -- not because it had everything the Democrats wanted.  In fact, it had very little that the Democrats wanted.  But we said, let’s go ahead and just make sure that other people aren’t hurt while negotiations are still taking place.
So that’s already passed the Senate.  And we know there are enough Republicans and Democrats to vote in the House of Representatives for the same thing.  So I want everybody to understand this:  There are enough Republicans and Democrats in the House of Representatives today that, if the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, simply let the bill get on the floor for an up-or-down vote, every congressman could vote their conscience  -- the shutdown would end today.
The only thing that is keeping the government shut down; the only thing preventing people from going back to work and basic research starting back up, and farmers and small business owners getting their loan -- the only thing that’s preventing all that from happening, right now, today, in the next five minutes, is that Speaker John Boehner won’t even let the bill get a yes-or-no vote, because he doesn’t want to anger the extremists in his party.  That’s all.  That’s what this whole thing is about. 
We’ve heard a lot from congressional Republicans in the past couple of days saying they don’t want this shutdown.  Well, there’s a simple way to prove it.  Send the bill to the floor, let everybody vote -- it will pass.  Send me the bill; I will sign it.  The shutdown will be over and we can get back to the business of governing and helping the American people.  (Applause.) 
It could happen in the next half hour.  National parks, monuments, offices would all reopen immediately.  Benefits and services would resume again.  Hundreds of thousands of dedicated public servants who are worrying about whether they’re going to be able to pay the mortgage or pay the car note, they’d start going back to work right away.  So my simple message today is:  Call a vote.  Call a vote. 
AUDIENCE:  Call a vote!  (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT:  Put it on the floor and let every individual member of Congress make up their own minds.  And they can show the American people, are you for a shutdown or not?  If you’re not for a shutdown, you’ll vote for the bill; if you’re for a shutdown, you won’t vote for a bill.  We don’t have to twist anybody’s arms.  But that way, the American people will be clear about who is responsible for the shutdown.  Or, alternatively, more hopefully, they’d be clear that this is something that doesn’t make sense and we should go ahead and make sure that we’re looking out for the American people.  It should be that simple.
But as I said, the problem we’ve got is that there’s one faction of one party, in one half of one branch of government that so far has refused to allow that yes-or-no vote unless they get some massive partisan concessions in exchange for doing what they’re supposed to be doing anyway, in exchange for doing what everybody else agrees is necessary.  And they won’t agree to end the shutdown until they get their way.  And you may think I’m exaggerating, but just the other day, one tea party Republican called the idea of a shutdown “wonderful.”  Another said that a shutdown is “exactly what we wanted.”  Well, they got exactly what they wanted.  Now they’re trying to figure out how to get out of it. 
Just yesterday, one House Republican said -- I'm quoting here, because I want to make sure people understand I didn't make this up.  One House Republican said, “We’re not going to be disrespected.  We have to get something out of this.  And I don’t know what that even is.”  That was a quote.  "We're not going to be disrespected.  We have got to get something out of this.  And I don't know what that even is."  Think about that.  
You have already gotten the opportunity to serve the American people.  There is no higher honor than that.  (Applause.)  You've already gotten the opportunity to help businesses like this one, workers like these.  So the American people aren't in the mood to give you a goodie bag to go with it.  What you get is our intelligence professionals being back on the job.  What you get is our medical researchers back on the job.  (Applause.)  What you get are little kids back into Head Start.  (Applause.)  What you get are our national parks and monuments open again.  What you get is the economy not stalling, but continuing to grow.  (Applause.)  What you get are workers continuing to be hired.  That's what you get.  That's what you should be asking for.  Take a vote, stop this farce, and end this shutdown right now.  (Applause.)
If you're being disrespected, it's because of that attitude you got that you deserve to get something for doing your job.  Everybody here just does their job, right?  If you're working here and in the middle of the day you just stopped and said, you know what, I want to get something, but I don't know exactly what I'm going to get.  (Laughter.)  But I'm just going to stop working until I get something.  I'm going to shut down the whole plant until I get something. 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  You'd get fired. 
THE PRESIDENT:  You'd get fired.  (Applause.)  Right?  Because the deal is you've already gotten hired.  You've got a job.  You're getting a paycheck.  And so you also are getting the pride of doing a good job and contributing to a business and looking out for your fellow workers.  That's what you're getting.  Well, it shouldn't be any different for a member of Congress.     
Now, unlike past shutdowns -- I want to make sure everybody understands this because, again, sometimes the tendency is to say, well, both sides are at fault.  This one has nothing to do with deficits or spending or budgets.  Our deficits are falling at the fastest pace in 60 years.  We’ve cut the deficits in half since I took office.  (Applause.)  And some of the things that the Republicans are asking for right now would actually add to our deficits, seriously.
So this is not about spending.  And this isn't about fiscal responsibility.  This whole thing is about one thing:  the Republican obsession with dismantling the Affordable Care Act and denying affordable health insurance to millions of Americans.  (Applause.)  That's all this has become about.  That seems to be the only thing that unites the Republican Party these days. 
Through this whole fight, they’ve said the American people don’t want Obamacare, so we should shut down the government to repeal it or delay it.  But here's the problem:  The government is now shut down, but the Affordable Care Act is still open for business.  (Applause.)  So they're not even accomplishing what they say they want to accomplish.  And, by the way, in the first two days since the new marketplaces -- basically big group plans that we've set up -- the first two days that they opened, websites where you can compare and purchase new affordable insurance plans and maybe get tax credits to reduce your costs, millions of Americans have made it clear they do want health insurance.  (Applause.) 
More than 6 million people visited the website HealthCare.gov the day it opened.  Nearly 200,000 people picked up the phone and called the call center.  In Kentucky alone -- this is a state where -- I didn’t win Kentucky.  (Laughter.)  So I know they weren't doing it for me.  In Kentucky, nearly 11,000 people applied for new insurance plans in the first two days -- just in one state, Kentucky.  And many Americans are finding out when they go on the website that they'll save a lot of money or get health insurance for the first time. 
So I would think that if, in fact, this was going to be such a disaster that the Republicans say it's going to be, that it was going to be so unpopular, they wouldn’t have to shut down the government.  They could wait, nobody would show any interest, there would be, like, two people on the website -- (laughter) -- and everybody would then vote for candidates who want to repeal it. 
It's not as if Republicans haven't had a chance to debate the health care law.  It passed the House of Representatives.  It passed the Senate.  The Supreme Court ruled it constitutional -- you remember all this.  Last November, voters rejected the presidential candidate that ran on a platform to repeal it.  (Applause.)  So the Affordable Care Act has gone through every single democratic process, all three branches of government.  It's the law of the land.  It's here to stay. 
I've said to Republicans, if there are specific things you think can improve the law to make it even better for people as opposed to just gutting it and leaving 25 million people without health insurance, I'm happy to talk to you about that.  But a Republican shutdown won't change the fact that millions of people need health insurance, and that the Affordable Care Act is being implemented.  The shutdown does not change that.  All the shutdown is doing is making it harder for ordinary Americans to get by, and harder for businesses to create jobs at a time when our economy is just starting to gain traction again. 
You've heard Republicans say that Obamacare will hurt the economy, but the economy has been growing and creating jobs.  The single-greatest threat to our economy and to our businesses like this one is not the Affordable Care Act, it's the unwillingness of Republicans in Congress to stop refighting a settled election, or making the demands that have nothing to do with the budget.  They need to move on to the actual business of governing.  That’s what will help the economy.  That's what will grow the economy.  That’s what will put people back to work.  (Applause.) 
And more than that, House Republicans need to stop careening from one crisis to another in everything they do.  Have you noticed that?  Since they've taken over the House of Representatives, we have one of these crises every three months.  Have you noticed?  And you keep on thinking, all right, well, this is going to be the last one; they're not going to do this again.  And then they do it again.
I know you're tired of it.  I’m tired of it.  It doesn’t mean that they're wrong on every single issue.  I've said I'm happy to negotiate with you on anything.  I don’t think any one party has a monopoly on wisdom.  But you don’t negotiate by putting a gun to the other person's head -- or, worse yet, by putting a gun to the American people's head by threatening a shutdown. 
And, by the way, even after Congress reopens your government, it's going to have to turn around very quickly and do something else -- and that's pay America's bills.  I want to spend a little time on this.  It's something called raising the debt ceiling.  And it's got a lousy name, so a lot of people end up thinking, I don’t know, I don't think we should raise our debt ceiling, because it sounds like we're raising our debt.  But that's not what this is about.
It doesn't cost taxpayers a single dime.  It doesn't grow our deficits by a single dime.  It doesn't allow anybody to spend any new money whatsoever.  So it's not something that raises our debt.  What it does is allow the U.S. Treasury, the U.S. government to pay the bills that Congress has already racked up.  I want you to think about this. 
If you go to a restaurant, you order a meal, you eat it.  Maybe you have some wine.  Maybe you have two glasses of wine -- great meal.  And then you look at the tab -- it's pretty expensive -- and you decide I'm not going to pay the bill.  But you're not saving money.  You're not being frugal.  You're just a deadbeat, right?  (Laughter.)  If you buy a house and you decide, this month I'd rather go on vacation somewhere so I'm not going to pay my mortgage, you didn't just save yourself some money.  You're just going to get foreclosed on. 
So you don't save money by not paying your bills.  You don't reduce your debt by not paying your bills.  All you're doing is making yourself unreliable and hurting your credit rating.  And you'll start getting those phone calls and those notices in the mail.  And the next time you try to borrow, somebody is going to say, uh-uh, because you don't pay your bills, you're a deadbeat.  Well, the same is true for countries.
The only thing that the debt ceiling does is to let the U.S. Treasury pay for what Congress has already bought.  That's why it's something that has been routine.  Traditionally, it's not a big deal.  Congress has raised it 45 times since Ronald Reagan took office.  This is just kind of a routine part of keeping the government running.  The last time the House Republicans flirted with not raising the debt ceiling, back in 2011 -- some of you remember this -- our economy took a bad hit.  Our country's credit rating was downgraded for the first time, just like you'd be downgraded if you didn't pay your mortgage.
This time, they are threatening to actually force the United States to default on its obligations for the very first time in history.  Now, you'll hear John Boehner and Mitch McConnell and these other Republicans say, we don't want to default.  But everybody knows -- it's written about in all the papers -- that their basic theory is, okay, if the shutdown doesn't work, then we are going to try to get some extra concessions out of the President.  We'll put like a long laundry list, all the things that we want that we can't get passed on our own.  And if we don't get it, we'll tell them we don't -- we won't vote to pay the country's bills.  We'll let the country default. 
I'm not just making this up.  I mean, it's common knowledge.  Every reporter here knows it.  And I want you to understand the consequences of this.  As reckless as a government shutdown is, as many people as are being hurt by a government shutdown, an economic shutdown that results from default would be dramatically worse.  In a government shutdown, Social Security checks still go out on time.  In an economic shutdown, if we don't raise the debt ceiling, they don't go out on time.
In a government shutdown, disability benefits still arrive on time.  In an economic shutdown, they don't.  In a government shutdown, millions of Americans -- not just federal workers -- everybody faces real economic hardship.  In an economic shutdown, falling pensions and home values and rising interest rates on things like mortgages and student loans -- all those things risk putting us back into a bad recession, which will affect this company and those workers and all of you.  That's not my analysis.  That's -- every economist out there is saying the same thing.  We've never done it before.
And the United States is the center of the world economy.  So if we screw up, everybody gets screwed up.  The whole world will have problems, which is why generally nobody has ever thought to actually threaten not to pay our bills.  It would be the height of irresponsibility.  And that's why I've said this before -- I'm going to repeat it:  There will be no negotiations over this.  (Applause.)  The American people are not pawns in some political game.  You don't get to demand some ransom in exchange for keeping the government running.  You don't get to demand ransom in exchange for keeping the economy running.  You don't get to demand ransom for doing your most basic job.        
And the sooner that the Republicans in Congress heed the warnings not just of me or Democrats like Chris and John, but heed the warnings of the Chamber of Commerce, and CEOs, and economists, and a whole lot of Republicans outside of Congress  -- they're all saying, do not do this.  They're all saying to Congress, do your job; and the sooner you do your job, the less damage you'll do to our economy and to businesses like this one.
So pass a budget, end the government shutdown.  Pay our bills.  Prevent an economic shutdown.  Just vote and end this shutdown.  And you should do it today so we can get back to growing this economy, creating jobs and strengthening our middle class.  (Applause.) 
Let me close just by sharing a story I heard as I was getting ready to come here today.  Many of you already know it.  Two years ago, a mulch factory next to M. Luis's main equipment storage facility caught fire, and most of the company's equipment was destroyed, causing millions of dollars in damage.  But even while the fire was still burning, dozens of employees rushed over to the facility and tried to save as much as they could -- some of you were probably there.  And when they finished cutting fire lines and spraying down the perimeter of their own property, they went over to help their neighbors. 
And afterwards, even though all the employees here at M. Luis are on salary, even though the company had just taken a big financial hit, Cidalia and Natalia paid everyone overtime, and along with each check they included a personalized note saying just how much they had appreciated the efforts of the workers.  And Cidalia said, everybody says the biggest asset to a business is employees.  Some people mean it, some people don’t -- we actually do. 
So this company right here is full of folks who do right by each other.  They don’t try to see if they can work every angle.  They don’t lie about each other.  They don’t try to undermine each other.  They understand they're supposed to be on the same team.  You pitch in, you look out for one another.  When somebody gets knocked down, you help them back up.  You don’t ask what can you get out of this, because you know that success doesn’t depend on one of you, it depends on all of you working together.
Well, America is no different.  I see that same spirit in so many cities and towns that I visit all across the country.  It is alive and well all across the country.  It's alive and well in this community where restaurants and businesses are rallying around their regulars, and they're looking out for all the dedicated public servants who have been furloughed.  You've been reading stories about restaurants who are saying, you know what, while you're on furlough, come on, we'll give you a burger, we'll give you a meal, we'll help you out.
That’s the American ideal.  It says, we're working together, looking out for one another, meeting our responsibilities, doing our jobs, thinking about future generations.  And that’s why I believe, ultimately, reason and common sense will prevail.  That spirit at some point will infiltrate Washington as well.  Because I think the American people are so good and so decent, they're going to get better behavior from their government than this.  And we'll once again make sure this is a country where you can make it if you try.

So thank you, everybody.  God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)»


http://mluisconstruction.com/images/SmartCEO1.jpg
http://mluisconstruction.com/images/smart%20ceo%207.11.pdf
http://ak.c.ooyala.com/hwY3Z1Yzr-nUEJQ7R0T3xrds60j-O69H/3Gduepif0T1UGY8H4xMDoxOjA4MTsiGN

With a lot work and talent another Portuguese person have success, Cristiano Ronaldo, like many Portuguese Persons around the World. Congratulations!

http://media2.ftbpro.com/post_image/image/1356320/462475857-ballon-dor-nominee-cristiano-ronaldo-of-portugal-and.jpg

Like the great football player, Eusébio also begun him extraordinary career in a Sporting team (Sporting de Lourenço Marques, Mozambique).

http://expresso.sapo.pt/users/1246/124640/eusebio1-d06a.jpg
http://expresso.sapo.pt/users/1246/124640/eusebio1-d06a.jpg


segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2014

PERDÃO - VENIAM - FORGIVENESS

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dd/Nicolas_Poussin_008.jpg/800px-Nicolas_Poussin_008.jpg
«Christ and the woman taken in adultery» Nicolas Poussin (1653)

Jesus words:
«Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself» Matthew´s Gospel 22:35-40
«Amarás o teu próximo como a ti mesmo.» Evangelho segundo Mateus 22:35-40

«8:1 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
8:2 And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.
8:3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
8:4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
8:5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
8:6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8:8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
8:9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
8:10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
8:11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.» John Gospel 7:53-8.1/8:11

«(...) dimitte nobis debita nostra,
sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris
. (...)» Verba secundum Matthaeum 6:9–13
«(...) perdoai as nossas ofensas assim como nós perdoamos a quem nos tem ofendido (...)» Evangelho segundo Mateus 6:9-13
«(...) forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. (...)» Matthew Gospel 6:9-13

But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also.” Luke Gospel 6:27-29
Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.” Luke Gospel 6:37

The answer to the tiranny of Nazism and the hommage of it victims is remember what happened for never forget generation by generation but also forgive the cumplicity of many persons with the monstruosity of the leaders, like Hitler or him partner Stalin, responsable together for milions of victims. In my opinion the Human penalty for that kind of human beings is the perpetual privation of them freedom, never what they did to the other Human Beings. The cumplicity with them by other human beings never implicate any kind of vengeance, only the privation of them freedom with different level of penalties in function of the level of gravity of them crimes.

Was not the case of many accomplices of III Reich that fall in an human and brutal injustice, like these SS guards of one of the many horrible champs of concentration created by them leaders:
http://www.geocities.ws/epjacobs4/lokaltermin1.jpg
Elisabeth Becker (20 July 1923 – 4 July 1946)

«(...) It was proved that she had been beating prisoners and that she was in charge of leading them to the gaschambers (...) She introduced a plea for clemency at the Polish Presidency . The court gave a favorable opinion to her demand and suggested a  15 year's imprisonment instead of the capital punishment as her crimes were lesser then Jenny Barkmann’s or Gerda Steinhoff’s , but President Boleslaw Bierut rejected her plea, confirmed the sentence (...)» http://www.geocities.ws/epjacobs4/elisabethe.htm
The President Boleslaw Bierut was an accomplice of the criminal tyrant Stalin that shared Poland with Hitler in a criminal pact in 1939 against Europe and Europeans. These capital penalties, like all, was a crime against Humanity. A court don´t have the right of decision about the sacred life of a human being. Only can private persons of them freedom. What happened in Nazism and Stalinism systems was montruous but the execution of the cumplices of Hitler and Stalin, like these SS guards, was horrible too.  

Ewa Paradies (17 December 1920 – 4 July 1946)
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQz3VTXqUG-1D6PY7GJZipnhLJUWgGD79EFJuij1UE7jbetO4F_tg
Jenny-Wanda Barkmann (1922 – July 4, 1946)
http://www.geocities.ws/epjacobs4/wanda5.jpg
The monstruosity of nazism against persons created monstruosities against nazis. This example is one in millions of victims of nazism and it terrorism:
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/4301/odvodjenjeveel1cd.jpg
Lepa Radić (1925–1943) a partisan victim of nazism. The nazis propose to her the revelation of her comrades and leaders identities. She responded that she was not a traitor and they would reveal themselves when they avenged her.

The abolition of capital penalty is crucial for Humanity. Don´t murder the criminal human being is included in the commandament «You shall not murder». Portugal was a good example in it abolition praised by the Humanist Victor Hugo in XIX century:
«Está pois a pena de morte abolida nesse nobre Portugal, pequeno povo que tem uma grande história. (...) Felicito a vossa nação. Portugal dá o exemplo à Europa. Desfrutai de antemão essa imensa glória. A Europa imitará Portugal. Morte à morte! Guerra à guerra! Viva a vida! Ódio ao ódio. A liberdade é uma cidade imensa da qual todos somos concidadãos» Victor Hugo (1876)
« [...] Messieurs, il y a trois choses qui sont à Dieu et qui n'appartiennent pas à l'homme : l'irrévocable, l'irréparable, l'indissoluble. Malheur à l'homme s'il les introduit dans ses lois. Tôt ou tard elles font plier la société sous leurs poids, elles dérangent l'équilibre nécessaire des lois et des mœurs, elles ôtent à la justice humaine ses proportions ; et alors il arrive ceci, réfléchissez-y, messieurs, que la loi épouvante la conscience [...] »
— Discours de Victor Hugo devant l'Assemblée constituante, 15 septembre 1848.

Jesus said to us to Love the other, included the enemies that implicate we forgive them and wish that they really repent of them ways of destruction and self destruction. By this way of peace we don´t have a long chain of destruction by destruction, war by war, vengeance by vengeance, negativity by negativity.
Jesus talk to us for we feel that and realize in our Being (to be), not only in our must or should be.

domingo, 12 de janeiro de 2014

ESCRAVIDÃO - SERVIDÃO - EXPLORAÇÃO - CRIAÇÃO / SERVITUS - COLONATO - ABUSIONEM - CREATIONEM - / SLAVERY - SERVITUDE - EXPLOITATION - CREATION

http://preacherwoman.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/slavery4.jpg
«Sale of Slaves in a Roman Camp» R. Coghe
http://ftsblog.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-07-at-11.25.16-AM-1024x576.png
«Screenshot from CNN's 'Slavery Then and Now'» http://ftsblog.net/2011/03/07/cnn-slavery-then-and-now/
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Les_Tr%C3%A8s_Riches_Heures_du_duc_de_Berry_juin.jpg/371px-Les_Tr%C3%A8s_Riches_Heures_du_duc_de_Berry_juin.jpg
«Juin» Limbourg brothers (Herman, Paul, and Johan) in «Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry» (1412-1416): a light vision of servitude and serfdom in feudalism
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/2761.jpg
«The Abolition Of Serfdom In Russia» by Aphonse Mucha (1914)
http://www.victorianweb.org/images/coaltub.gifhttp://historymartinez.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/industrial-revolution.jpg?w=640http://www1.curriculum.edu.au/ddunits/images/ls3fq2_2.gifhttp://www1.curriculum.edu.au/ddunits/images/ls3fq2_3.gif
English industrial revolution and Liberalism: Persons become free of servitude but conditionated to work without means of production, folow Karl Marx. With a deep social work division Employment turns the key for survive ... Society could progresse but with many victims and a deep reaction and the failure of Liberalism in XX century that triggered the success of Social Democracy ... but the corruption in a blocked statism give another opportunity to Liberalism by an answer of the «nineteen seventies» that rised in the «nineteen eighties». Now we live them failure that implicate an Human answer that transcend Liberalism and Statism with Societies much more develloped, with much more Persons with an high level of Culture ...
http://wodumedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/American-film-actress-Veronica-Lake-illustrates-what-can-happen-to-women-war-workers-who-wear-their-hair-long-while-working-at-their-benches-in-a-factory-somewhere-in-America-on-November-9-1943.-AP-Photo-650x524.jpg
«American film actress Veronica Lake, illustrates what can happen to women war workers who wear their hair long while working at their benches, in a factory somewhere in America, on November 9, 1943. (AP Photo)» http://wodumedia.com/world-war-ii-women-at-war/american-film-actress-veronica-lake-illustrates-what-can-happen-to-women-war-workers-who-wear-their-hair-long-while-working-at-their-benches-in-a-factory-somewhere-in-america-on-november-9-1943/               
http://s3.hipertextual.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/16/files/2013/07/Untitled-163-800x320.jpg
China turned an industrial factory of the world but without respect of persons with devaluation of them work, without respect for them rights, environment and quality.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1KOmPX00tKU/UJwR1q3L4II/AAAAAAAAC0A/_pLIIhEfP-A/s1600/artist-in-her-studio-by-warren-chang.jpg
«The Artist in Her Studio» by the Chinese painter Warren Chang (2004)
http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/u/TvyamNb-BivtNwcoxtkc5xGBuGkIMh_nj4UJHQKuoXVOxgFUqFYJFl0VxcWSqebuk1wgPlu2876AFQ/
«A local sand artist create his imagery by sand, he works part-time everyday at Puri Beach, Orrisa, India» Photo and caption by Nitai Mondal - National Geographic (http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/travel/traveler-magazine/photo-contest/2013/entries/202247/view/ )
http://im.ft-static.com/content/images/4a9662b2-57c3-11e3-86d1-00144feabdc0.img
Eleanor Cardozo, British sculptor at work in her Geneva studio
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aXAIqC1hLgQ/UQfPeUrly1I/AAAAAAAADkw/L1CafYXdHCU/s1600/PompeiinWomanPainter55-79AD.tiff
«Pompeian Woman Painting» by a Roman painter of Pompeia in 55-79 a.C
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T064WyA7MKU/US_4FZShhUI/AAAAAAAARVY/P8iwdTT_OAY/s1600/1354560634_039477_1354563664_album_normal.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_FpwkmE3dm50/RwtZlJTwtUI/AAAAAAAAAJk/eWC3EuqAGAQ/s1600/sapho.jpg«Safo» by a Roman painter of Pompeia
http://lostonsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/andrea-gastaldi-safo-1872.jpg«Safo» Andrea Gastaldi (1872)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--SRCvTC5pUo/UIasfjcS3bI/AAAAAAAACns/sB566jOsBnk/s1600/nmareia_jpg.jpg
«Painter in Her Atelier» by an unknown artist (14XX)
"The Artist" Avril Thomas
http://womenintheactofpainting.blogspot.pt/search/label/Anna%20Rose%20Bain
http://antalyapiyanofestivali.com/12/en/wp-content/gallery/labeque-sisters/img_3822-panorama-copy.jpg
Katia and Marielle Labèque, piano duo of sisters (were born in Bayone - France)

Escravidão: Ausência de Liberdade pela força bruta
do Neolítico à Antiguidade, à Modernidade e Época Contemporânea
Da invenção da Agricultura aos impérios da Antiguidade e da Modernidade até à actualidade

Servidão: Liberdade fortemente condicionada pela força
Da Antiguidade à Idade Média, à Modernidade e Idade Contemporânea
Do latifúndio romano (latus+fundus amplo+poder) ao Feudalismo que se estende até à Rússia do século XX

Exploração: Liberdade condicionada, consenso forçado pela dependência do trabalho para a sociedade
Da Modernidade à Idade Contemporânea
Da revolução industrial inglesa, o Capitalismo e a sua evolução, cada vez mais descondicionamento da liberdade nos países desenvolvidos até à emergência dos países menos desenvolvidos outra vez com cada vez mais condicionamento da liberdade

Criação: Liberdade descondicionada, trabalho livre para realização pessoal e social!
Da Idade Contemporânea à Idade Futura
A capacidade da Humanidade se descondicionar da Natureza e do materialismo e viver em Harmonia com o seu Meio Ambiente e consigo própria potencia menos tempo de trabalho necessário e condicionamento e mais tempo de trabalho-lazer com prazer, que muitas pessoas já realizam nos nossos dias. Será o advento da Economia e Sociedade baseada na Cultura, na Arte, na Espiritualidade, na criação em que o Ser está mais próximo do seu dever ser, em que o Ser está próximo do seu Criador!

A História da Humanidade vai criando as condições objectivo-subjectivas para a Evolução da escravidão à criação!


Com a agricultura
Começa a escravatura
Com o latifúndio
Começa o servo infortúnio
Com a capitalística revolução
Começa a livre mas condicionada exploração
Mas esta progressiva Libertação
Prepara o caminho para a pessoal realização
Numa sociedade e num Mundo baseado na Criação
Escravidão, servidão e exploração
São expressões históricas de tirânica opressão
Da brutal força a um brutal consenso
O poder exerce-se sem senso
Até que o Amor prevalecerá
E a criatividade cultural e felicidade se realizará

O respeito pela Liberdade da Pessoa é sagrado! O limite da Liberdade é a própria Liberdade!

«Mesmo» no dia «mais» alegre
s«em tempo de servidão
há sempre alguém que» lembre
«há sempre alguém que diz não.» 

adaptado de Manuel Alegre «Trova do Vento que Passa» (1963)

http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/434/858/434858665_640.jpg
Human traffic and prostitution is one of the multiple forms of tiranny against Persons in XXI century (http://vimeo.com/64194956, Halogen production - 2012)
http://endthedemand.org/user_images/respect-women.jpg
http://www.katzenjammerdesigns.com/images/ptf-creative-drawing2.jpg
http://www.katzenjammerdesigns.com/portfoliocreative.html

«A man (...) who looks first to a woman's outer beauty will never know her beauty divine, (...) a man who sees (...) her beauty first in spirit and truth, that man will know "Divinity" in that woman.» - «International Women's Day : Women Are Sacred !» March 08, 2011 - White Wolf Pack http://www.whitewolfpack.com/2011/03/international-womens-day-women-are.html